The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Thomas, 5 F.3d 543 (9th Cir. 1993):
We do reject, however, [the] argument that ... no reasonable person would freely consent to a search of luggage that he or she knows contains drugs. This argument cannot prevail because the "reasonable person" test presupposes an innocent person.
Florida v. Bostick, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 2388 (1991).
II. Statements Made After Arrest
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.