Does the admissibility of evidence which involve factual determinations rather than questions of law be reviewed for an abuse of discretion?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Drummond, 15 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 1993):

Questions of the admissibility of evidence which involve factual determinations, rather than questions of law, are reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Wood, 943 F.2d 1048, 1055 n. 9 (9th Cir.1991).

Other Questions


When reviewing a court's award of fees for abuse of discretion, how do we review the underlying factual determinations for clear error? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts reviewed the admissibility of evidence in the context of abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the proper standard of review for denying a motion to reopen on the grounds of abuse, abuse and abuse of review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for judicial review of judicial review rulings in cases involving abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the admission of evidence of other crimes been reviewed for abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does abuse of review apply in cases involving abuse of abuse of power? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for an abuse of discretion ruling on the admissibility of trial evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the implications of a finding of "abuse of discretion" in a finding that a judge abused discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a review of a federal court's decision not to admit evidence of abuse of discretion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for "abuse of discretion" when it comes to the admissibility of evidence at trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.