Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to any ruling on a motion for a mistrial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Berry, D071343 (Cal. App. 2018):

An appellate court applies the abuse of discretion standard of review to any ruling on a motion for a mistrial. (People v. Williams (1997) 16 Cal.4th 153, 210.)

3. Application

Other Questions


When reviewing a motion for a new trial, does the appellate court apply the standard of "abuse of discretion" in denying the motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a ruling denying a mistrial motion? (California, United States of America)
Are evidentiary rulings reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard of review? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of the standard of review apply to "any ruling by the trial court on the admissibility of evidence"? (California, United States of America)
How does the abuse of review standard apply to a ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a ruling on an anti-SLAPP motion, how do we review an order granting or denying a motion to strike under section 425.16 de novo? (California, United States of America)
How does the abuse of review standard of review apply? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of review standard apply to any ruling by the trial court on admissibility of evidence including requests for judicial notice? (California, United States of America)
How should the Court of Appeal review the first-stage ruling of a motion to review the denial of Batson/Wheeler motion? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of or substantial evidence standard apply to a review of a trial court ruling on the unclean hands defense? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.