California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hurtado, 2d Crim. No. B271115 (Cal. App. 2017):
But even had the trial court erred, Hurtado has not shown a reasonable probability that the absence of the motive evidence would change the result. (People v. Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, 836.) The People's evidence was strong and the evidence of guilt was overwhelming. Three eyewitnesses identified Hurtado at trial. There was surveillance video evidence. Hurtado did not testify or call witnesses in a defense case.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.