Does Sterling challenge only the second of the five elements of the federal drug trafficking case?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Sterling, 742 F.2d 521 (9th Cir. 1984):

Sterling challenges only the sufficiency of the evidence to support the second of the five elements--the continuing series of violations requirement. This circuit has interpreted a "continuing series" as consisting of three or more federal narcotics violations. United States v. Valenzuela, 596 F.2d 1361, 1367 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 865, 100 S.Ct. 136, 62 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979).

Other Questions


Does Section 5G1.3 of the Federal Guidelines for Federal Sentences apply to a defendant who is convicted of a federal charge of possession of a firearm by a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of a federal action for non-federal action in which a plaintiff is seeking to force a federal judge to dismiss the federal action? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a defendant who committed both enhancing elements of the elements of second-degree robbery and possession of a firearm an enhanced element of the crime? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a second or successive habeas petition filed in a federal district or federal court a "second or successive" application? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What federal injunctive relief is needed in a civil case brought by a defendant in a criminal case brought in good faith under a statute of doubtful constitutional validity? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been successful in a federal civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have federal courts interpreted state law in federal cases? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.