Does Section 815.6 of the California Vehicle Accident and Accident Act require that a plaintiff has a mandatory duty to wear a seatbelt?

Section 815.6 also requires that "the mandatory duty be designed to protect against the particular kind of injury the plaintiff suffered." ( Haggis v. Superior Court, supra, 22 Cal.4th at p. 499, 93 Cal.Rptr.2d 327, 993 P.2d 983.) The injury must be " one of the consequences which the [enacting body] sought to prevent through imposing the alleged mandatory duty. " ( Ibid. ) "That the enactment confers some benefit on the class to which plaintiff belongs is not enough; if the

[223 Cal.App.4th 1093]