California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from In Re Nathan Pope On Habeas Corpus., 237 P.3d 552, 50 Cal.4th 777 (Cal. 2010):
Indeed, the approach we took in Reeves, supra, 35 Cal.4th 765, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 4, 110 P.3d 1218, supports the conclusion that the credit-limiting statute at issue in the present case does apply to petitioner's sentence. Section 654 prohibits multiple punishment, but it does not operate to bar multiple conviction. ( People v. Pearson (1986) 42 Cal.3d 351, 359, 228 Cal.Rptr. 509, 721 P.2d 595.) Although execution of the sentence for petitioner's credit-limiting offenses has been stayed under section 654, he still is convicted of those offenses both as a formal matter, in the sense that the convictions have not been dismissed or stayed (see People v. Pearson, supra, at p. 360, 228 Cal.Rptr. 509, 721 P.2d 595;
[237 P.3d 557]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.