Does Section 496d of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant who was convicted of receiving a stolen vehicle?

Defendant also claims that equal protection principles require that Proposition 47 relief apply to section 496d convictions. The problem is that defendant has not demonstrated that his conviction for receiving a stolen vehicle places him in a class of persons similarly situated to those who receive relief under Proposition 47. (See Cooley v. Superior Court (2002) 29 Cal.4th 228, 253 ["'The first prerequisite to a meritorious claim under the equal protection clause is a showing that the state has adopted a classification that affects two or more similarly situated groups in an unequal manner.'"].)