Does section 215 of the California Code of Criminal Procedure require that the victim was not present at the time of the robbery?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Walker, A137905 (Cal. App. 2019):

Addressing defendants' argument, it is important to note section 215 "does not require that the victim be inside or touching the vehicle at the time of the taking." (People v. Medina (1995) 39 Cal.App.4th 643, 650.) Rather, the requirement that the defendant "took the car from the victim's 'person or immediate presence[]' ( 215, subd. (a)[]) . . . is similar to the equivalent requirement for robbery. Due to differences in

Page 24

Other Questions


Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 215 of the California Code of Criminal Procedure require that the victim was sitting in the vehicle at the time of the robbery? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Code of Criminal Procedure, section 654 of the Criminal Code, allow a defendant to be punished for more than one act? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be punished under section 654(1) of the California Criminal Code for failing to comply with the requirements of Section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Does a conviction for kidnapping for the purpose of robbery support a conviction under section 654 of the California Criminal Code for moving a robbery victim a distance beyond the intended location? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be punished under section 654 of the California Criminal Code for failing to comply with the requirements of Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure, section 1054 et. seq. and section 854 of the Criminal Code, allow defense counsel to conduct their investigation and prepare for trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.