Does section 190.3, subdivision (k) of the California Criminal Code require a jury to consider "any other circumstance which extenuates the gravity of the crime" as a mitigating factor in sentencing?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Brown, 250 Cal.Rptr. 604, 46 Cal.3d 432, 758 P.2d 1135 (Cal. 1988):

We noted in People v. Easley, supra, 34 Cal.3d 858, 196 Cal.Rptr. 309, 671 P.2d 813, that section 190.3, subdivision (k) (which is reproduced in former CALJIC No. 8.84.1) speaks only of a "circumstance which extenuates the gravity of the crime." In order to better serve constitutional concerns we imposed the prospective requirement that "trial courts--in instructing on the factor embodied in section 190.3, subdivision (k)--should inform the jury that it may consider as a mitigating factor 'any other circumstance which extenuates the gravity of the crime even though it is not a legal excuse for the crime' and any other 'aspect of [the] defendant's character or record ... that the defendant proffers as a basis for a sentence less than death.' " (34 Cal.3d 858, 878, fn. 10, 196 Cal.Rptr. 309, 671 P.2d 813.)

Other Questions


Does section 190.3 of the California Criminal Code allow the penalty phase jury to consider the "circumstances" of the crime within the meaning of section 190 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 190.3 of the California Criminal Code require a penalty phase jury to consider a defendant's unadjudicated criminal activity as a mitigating factor in the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 669, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, section 669 of the Criminal Code apply to a life sentence for a convicted rapist who has been sentenced to life in prison without a chance of parole? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Does section 190.3 of the California Criminal Code require a jury to consider whether certain mitigating factors were present? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's sentencing error under section 667.5, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to recidivism enhancements under sections 667 and 667 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(1) of the California Criminal Code apply to a person convicted of a criminal street crime committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 190.3 of the California Criminal Code require a trial court to instruct that certain sentencing factors (d), (e), (f) and (h) are relevant only as potential mitigators? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant pleads and proves that he meets the requirements for sentencing as a habitual offender under section 667.7, subdivision (a)(1) of the California Criminal Code, what is the applicable sentence? (California, United States of America)
Does section 8.85 of the California Criminal Code, which instructed the jury to consider whether or not certain mitigating factors were present, unconstitutionally suggest that the absence of such factors amounted to aggravation? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.