Does section 1157 of the California Criminal Code apply when the prosecution alleges that the killing was committed during perpetration of robbery or burglary?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Anderson, A136451 (Cal. App. 2018):

In People v. Mendoza (2000) 23 Cal.4th 896, 900 (Mendoza), the court held that section 1157 does not apply when the prosecution's only murder theory at trial is that the killing was committed during perpetration of robbery or burglary, which is first degree murder as a matter of law. The court explained that felony murder is not a crime " 'which is distinguished into degrees' " within the meaning of section 1157 because, if the jury finds that the homicide was committed during the commission of any of the offenses enumerated in section 189, the homicide is first degree murder by operation of law. (Id. at p. 908.) If the evidence supports only a finding of guilty or not guilty of felony murder and no other theory of murder, the trial court is justified in withdrawing the question of degree from the jury and instructing that the defendant is either not guilty, or is guilty of felony murder. (Id. at pp. 908-909.)

Other Questions


Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(1) of the California Criminal Code apply to a person convicted of a criminal street crime committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, Section 654 of the Criminal Code protect a defendant against prosecution for an act or omission committed during a course of conduct deemed to be indivisible in time? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Does section 189 of the California Criminal Code apply to a robbery where a robber shot and killed a police officer while fleeing from the scene of the robbery? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667.6 of the California Criminal Code (c) of Section 654 of the Criminal Code apply to a burglary conviction? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant avoid punishment for both burglary and robbery under section 654 of the California Criminal Code where the burglary was incident to the objective of stealing from the victim? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant who has committed a criminal offence under the same law? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant commits both burglary and intended robbery against a single victim, does section 654 of the California Criminal Code permit punishment for one crime but not for the other? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's sentencing error under section 667.5, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code apply to recidivism enhancements under sections 667 and 667 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.