Does section 1009 of the California Criminal Code protect a defendant's right to due process?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Granger, A123363 (Cal. App. 2011):

"[S]ection 1009 protects a defendant's right to due process." (People v. Pitts (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 606, 904, superseded by statute on other grounds.) Section 1009 provides, in relevant part: "The court in which an action is pending may order or permit an amendment of an indictment, accusation or information, or the filing of an amended complaint, for any defect or insufficiency, at any stage of the proceedings . . . . The defendant shall be required to plead to such an amendment or amended pleading forthwith, . . . and the trial or other proceeding shall continue as if the pleading had been originally filed as amended, unless the substantial rights of the defendant would be prejudiced thereby, in which event a reasonable postponement, not longer than the ends of justice require, may be granted. An indictment or accusation cannot be amended so as to change the offense charged, nor an information so as to charge an offense not shown by the evidence taken at the preliminary examination."

Other Questions


Does section 1305, subdivision (b) of the California Criminal Code, section 977 of the Criminal Code apply to a defendant's right to be present at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, Section 654 of the Criminal Code protect a defendant against prosecution for an act or omission committed during a course of conduct deemed to be indivisible in time? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
How has section 352 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted and what is the effect of section 352 on a defendant's right to a fair trial and due process? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found to have committed a single physical act for purposes of section 654 of the California Criminal Code, Section 215 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 422 of the Criminal Code for carjacking? (California, United States of America)
Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be punished under section 654 of the California Criminal Code for failing to comply with the requirements of Section 654, subdivision (a) of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is Section 654 of the California Criminal Code applicable to a defendant who has committed a criminal offence under section 654 (1) of the Act 654, 654? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for Section 654 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant is found guilty of a breach of section 654 or section 744 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.