California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from San Francisco Unified School Dist. v. State of California, 131 Cal.App.3d 54, 182 Cal.Rptr. 525 (Cal. App. 1982):
Recently in Kruelle v. New Castle County Sch. Dist., supra, 642 F.2d 687, the identical issue was presented. Residential placement was sought for an emotionally troubled child. The school district argued that "here the residential placement is required only for reasons of medical and domiciliary care, not for educational purposes." (Id., at p. 693.) Reflecting this argument, the court held that: "Analysis must focus ... on whether full-time placement may be considered necessary for educational purposes, or whether the residential placement is a response to medical, social or emotional problems that are segregable from the learning process." (Ibid.) 12
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.