Does rescission fall within the anti-SLAPP statute?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from In re Outlaw Lab., LP Litig., Case No.: 18-cv-840-GPC-BGS (S.D. Cal. 2020):
Under California law, rescission does not fall within the ambit of the anti-SLAPP statute. As the California courts have repeatedly held, "[r]escission is not a cause of action; it is a remedy."5 Nakash v. Superior Ct., 196 Cal. App. 3d 59, 70 (1987); see also
Page 34
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the contention in the second cause of action under the Statute of Limitations apply to a claim that a claim for money had and received and therefore comes within the statute of limitation? ("New York", United States of America)
Can a borrowed state statute of limitations be tolled in a claim based on a federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for judicial deference to an administrative tribunal on the interpretation of its "home statute" or statute? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the felon-in-possession statute extend to all guns manufactured after the effective date of the statute's effective date? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between the federal extortion statute and the state-law bribery statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can damages be sought under a statute with an explicit private right of action where the statute does not specify the remedies available? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a statute requires knowledge of the jurisdictional element of a claim, when the statute itself states that knowledge is not an essential element, is that knowledge required? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a federal district court's interpretation of a federal statute a de novo review of the interpretation of the federal statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of a statute in the context of the history of the statute? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
