Does preemption apply when an employer is not obligated to continue to provide health benefits?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Marshall v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co., 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 72, 2 Cal.4th 1045, 832 P.2d 573 (Cal. 1992):

1 The fact that the employer was not obligated to continue to provide health benefits weighs against preemption. (Donovan v. Dillingham (11th Cir.1982) 688 F.2d 1367, 1374-1375.)

Other Questions


Does continuous accrual apply when there is a continuing or recurring obligation? (California, United States of America)
Does an employer have an obligation to pay attorney's fees to an employee where a judgment has been obtained against a third party tortfeasor for the employer's benefit? (California, United States of America)
Does the State Department of Health and Social Services have an obligation to provide mental health treatment under the State Suicide Prevention Act? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1001.36 of the California Mental Health Act apply to a defendant's mental health? (California, United States of America)
Does the employer have to pay a member's wages and benefits accrued during the period of time they were employed? (California, United States of America)
How does section 2970 of the California Mental Health Act apply when a defendant is committed to a long-term mental health commitment? (California, United States of America)
Does the Thirteenth Amendment ban on involuntary servitude apply to employment undertaken to meet a parent's child support obligation? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim that a regulation does not give notice to an employer when the employer is an "employer"? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054.3(b) of the Mental Health Act restrict the prosecution's access to materials derived from mental health examinations conducted under section 1054 of the Act, which were obtained from a mental health clinic? (California, United States of America)
When a city acquires a water system from a community owned by another community, does it have an obligation to continue providing water to all of the other community's residents? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.