Does post-stroke mental deterioration need to be a factor in the determination that a moving party was neglected?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Rayn v. Besneatte, A145818 (Cal. App. 2017):
212 Cal.App.2d 196, 207-208 [post-stroke mental deterioration].) But to establish excusable neglect on the basis of disability, the moving party must show that the disability, and not something else, was the reason for the neglect. (See Davis v. Thayer (1980) 113 Cal.App.3d 892, 909.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a jury should consider a defendant's mental state as a mitigating factor in determining the penalty? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to determine whether a defendant's mental state was not a factor in determining whether they had committed a sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party has a burden of burden on moving parties? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's age, education, physical condition, and mental health are factors used in determining whether they should be charged with assault? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's intent or mental state is a factor in determining whether they intended to commit an act of violence? (California, United States of America)
When will a jury consider a defendant's mental state as a mitigating factor in determining his mental state? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 190.20 of the California Criminal Code on factors (h) and factor (b) in determining a defendant's sentence for assault with a deadly weapon and battery on a peace officer? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1054.3(b) of the Mental Health Act restrict the prosecution's access to materials derived from mental health examinations conducted under section 1054 of the Act, which were obtained from a mental health clinic? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury double-count the factors used to determine whether a defendant has been convicted of a capital crime as a result of the factor? (California, United States of America)
