The following excerpt is from Lucas v. U.S., 963 F.2d 8 (2nd Cir. 1992):
Because Lucas had already served the majority of his sentence, however, the court held that the usual remedy of vacating the conviction and allowing the defendant to plead anew was not appropriate in the circumstances. Instead, following our decision in United States v. Khan, 869 F.2d 661 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 682, 112 L.Ed.2d 674 (1991), the court excised the prejudicial portion of the sentence.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.