The following excerpt is from United States v. 008-760-12, Including All Appurtances, No. 12-16590 (9th Cir. 2015):
dismissal, as if it were a statutory standing defect, would appear to render subpart (B) of Rule G(8)(c)(i) redundant, violating a fundamental canon of construction. Christensen v. Comm'r, 523 F.3d 957, 961 (9th Cir. 2008) ("We should avoid an interpretation that would render the subsections redundant.").2
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.