Does defendant waive his claim that he was entitled to have his jury instructed that the victim submitted as a result of the implied threat or violence?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Jennings, 251 Cal.Rptr. 278, 46 Cal.3d 963, 760 P.2d 475 (Cal. 1988):

However, we find defendant waived his further claim that he was entitled to have his jury instructed that before considering the evidence of the 1971 sex crimes, it must find the victim submitted as a result of the implied threat of force or violence. Even assuming arguendo that such subjective knowledge is legally required, the normal rule is that "a defendant's failure to request instruction on the elements of the other-crimes aggravating evidence will preclude him from raising the issue on appeal." (People v. Davenport (1985) 41 Cal.3d 247, 282, 221 Cal.Rptr. 794, 710 P.2d 861.) Defendant is unpersuasive in arguing that he should be excepted from this general rule.

Other Questions


Does the implied threat of violence in the context of possession of knives and firearms constitute an implied threat to violence? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's claim that Defendant has "waived" a claim that the Defendant has failed to object to the victim's restitution award? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant who points a gun at the victim's head and makes a conditional threat to shoot the victim if he refuses to leave, constitute assault by conditional threat? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who made a threat to set fire to a building after making the threat, setting fire to the victim's workplace after the threat was made? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the prosecution reduced the burden of proving a defendant's guilt by failing to instruct the jury that refusal was insufficient to establish guilt? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a jury be instructed to consider "the expressed or implied threat to use force or violence" as a factor in determining penalty? (California, United States of America)
Is defendant's possession of a loaded firearm sufficient to permit a jury to view his possession as an implied threat of violence? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to propose any modification to a flight instruction forfeits a claim of instructional error? (California, United States of America)
Is there any evidence of violence or threat of violence against defendant? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.