The following excerpt is from United States v. Gutierrez-Gomez, No. 2:19-cr-0006-KJM (E.D. Cal. 2020):
chosen legal theory rather constraining the defense. This is particularly so where "[a]n omission, or an incomplete instruction, is less likely to be prejudicial than a misstatement of the law." Henderson v. Kibbe, 431 U.S. 145, 155 (1977). Defendant's moving papers provide no argument to the contrary. Defendant's second issue on appeal also does not raise a "substantial question" here.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.