Does an employee have a constitutionally protected property interest in continued employment?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Barlow v. Vick, 933 F.2d 1013 (9th Cir. 1991):
An employee has a constitutionally protected property interest in continued employment when the employee has a legitimate claim of entitlement to the benefit of continued employment. Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972). Laws, rules, or understandings derived from independent sources, such as state law, create such claims of entitlement. Id.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a government employee have a constitutionally protected property interest in continued employment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How does the Fourteenth Amendment apply to public sector employees who have a property interest in the terms or conditions of their employment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does an employer need to make clear to employees that the employer will have the final determination of employee benefits decisions? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is a permanent employee or a temporary employee of a company that has acquired a property interest sufficient for a hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff is a permanent employee or a temporary employee of a company that has acquired a property interest? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can an employer refuse to reemploy an employee on the basis that another employee was hired to fill the position during the employee's absence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is an employee required to obtain an employment authorization to engage and continue in employment in Canada? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does intervenor have a "significant protectable interest" when it asserts an interest that is not protected by law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does Section 6672 of the Federal Tax Code require an employer to withhold withholding from an employee, even if the employer pays withholding taxes to the employee? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a party who denied possession of a property at the time of the purchase of the property entitled to a third party's property? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
