Does admitting to a statement by a co-defendant constitute a denial of his right to confrontation?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from United States v. Sullivan, 435 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1971):

Appellant asserts that the admission of the statement was a denial of his right to confrontation, since his co-defendant Binning did not take the stand and could not be cross-examined regarding it. Bruton v. United States, supra.

Other Questions


Is the need to train police officers in the constitutional limitations on the use of deadly force so obvious that failure to do so would constitute deliberate indifference to constitutional rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In deciding whether to admit hearsay statements made by conspirators against their co-conspirators, what is the test for admitting such statements? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether prison officials were on actual or constructive notice that the risk to inmates' constitutional rights was substantially certain to result in a violation of their constitutional rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a non-testifying codefendant's statement at their joint trial deprive a defendant of his Sixth Amendment right to confront adverse witnesses? ("New York", United States of America)
Is there any federal or statutory violation of a person's right to exercise their constitutional, statutory or constitutional right? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a civil case brought by a plaintiff, who alleges that the county failed to properly train for the purpose of enforcing her civil rights, is a county liable for the violation of her constitutional rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a guilty plea constitute a waiver of constitutional rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have a right to be free to exercise his constitutionally protected right to petition for redress? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the current limitation period for a plaintiff in a civil rights class action based upon a denial of seniority rights? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have to respond to a Defendant's statement stating that the material facts contained in that statement are to be admitted as a matter of law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.