Does admitting evidence of a criminal gang constitute a violation of the appellant's right to privacy?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Carranza, A152211 (Cal. App. 2019):
8. Because there were "permissible inferences the jury [could] draw from the [gang] evidence," admission of the evidence did not violate appellant's federal constitutional right to due process. (People v. Albarran, supra, 149 Cal.App.4th at p. 229.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the admission of evidence in a civil case of criminal proceedings against Fuentes violate his federal constitutional right to exercise his right to privacy? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting into evidence of volunteered statements by a defendant prior to his having been advised of his rights under the Federal Constitution violate such rights? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting to evidence that a defendant was a member of a criminal gang deprive appellant of his right to stand trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's reliance on evidence code section 730 of the Evidence Code Section 730 a violation of his constitutional right to access a mental health expert? (California, United States of America)
Does the application of "ordinary rules of evidence" such as section 352 of California Evidence Code section 352 violate a defendant's constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does admitting evidence pursuant to California Evidence Code section 1237 impermissibly deny defendants their constitutional rights to confrontation and cross-examination? (California, United States of America)
Is an invasion of privacy a violation of the state constitutional right to privacy if the invasion is justified by a competing interest? (California, United States of America)
Can a statement obtained in violation of the Miranda rights be admitted as evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does a brief cross-examination challenged by appellant in a civil case violate the appellant's constitutional due process rights? (California, United States of America)
What waiver of appeal rights apply to a criminal defendant who knowingly waives any significant right such as constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
