California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Transcentury Properties, Inc. v. State of California, 116 Cal.Rptr. 487, 41 Cal.App.3d 835 (Cal. App. 1974):
Respondents argue that, regardless of the propriety of the trial court's intended course of action, the trial court has not acted and hence prohibition is not a proper remedy. If a court makes an order or ruling in excess of jurisdiction (conduct which in itself indicates an intention to act in accordance with the order or ruling), a writ of prohibition will issue. (Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal (1941) 17 Cal.2d 280, 288--291, 109 P.2d 942.) Therefore, prohibition is a proper remedy in this case.
Page 491
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.