The following excerpt is from Bill v. Brewer, 799 F.3d 1295 (9th Cir. 2015):
Dalia v. United States, 441 U.S. 238, 255, 99 S.Ct. 1682, 60 L.Ed.2d 177 (1979) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). There can be no contest that the orders here satisfied the first and third requirements: they were issued by a superior court judge and described a saliva sample to be seized by mouth swab from the person of the plaintiffs. Whether the orders satisfy the Warrant Clause therefore turns on whether the submitted
[799 F.3d 1301]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.