The following excerpt is from Aziz v. U.S. Bank (In re Aziz), BAP No. AZ-16-1133-BTaF (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2017):
issue. Ross v. Thompson (In re Levine), 162 B.R. 858, 859 (9th Cir. BAP 1994) (court's "under advisement ruling" was not a final appealable order because it did not evidence the judge's intention that the order was the court's final act, as counsel was directed in that order to lodge an order consistent with the under advisement ruling).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.