Does a tying claim need to be successful under the rule of reason?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from County of Tuolumne v. Sonora Commun. Hosp., 236 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2001):
Defendants argue that plaintiffs' tying claim must fail under the rule of reason because plaintiffs have proven no more than injury to one competitor, not to competition itself. This court has held that "the elimination of a single competitor, standing alone, does not prove anticompetitive effect." Austin v. McNamara,
Page 1159
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a party has been successful in successfully challenging a claim of relevancy? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When is a creditor's failure to process late filed claims an acceptable reason for denying late claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are some cases where a party has been successful in claiming to be able to exclude or amend a party's statement of claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion where a claim has been made that the claim is not reasonable? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a class action settlement that pays more for federal claims than for state law claims reasonable? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If there is an error in the finding that a defendant is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of reasonable doubt, is that error harmless beyond reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the reasons used by the courts to determine whether a train operator has a valid claim? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
