Does a trial court have to instruct on voluntary manslaughter?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Clark, B246263 (Cal. App. 2014):

A trial court must sua sponte instruct on a lesser included offense if there is substantial evidence the defendant is guilty only of the lesser offense. (People v. Birks (1998) 19 Cal.4th 108, 118.) But as we discussed above, there was no substantial evidence of sufficient provocation to support voluntary manslaughter. Assuming for the sake of argument that substantial evidence existed, the court nevertheless was not required to instruct on voluntary manslaughter.

Other Questions


Does the Court of Appeal err in refusing an instruction from the trial court on the lesser offense of attempted voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that the trial court erroneously refused to instruct on voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant's objection to giving instructions on voluntary manslaughter preclude a finding of error in the trial court's failure to do so? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court err when it did not instruct the jury on a provocation theory of voluntary manslaughter or second degree murder? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the trial court instruct the jury on a lesser included charge of voluntary manslaughter rather than murder? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have a duty to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter and attempted voluntary manslaughter as lesser included offenses of murder and attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.