Does a tangible asset or concrete gain need to be present to satisfy the requirement that the action confer a significant benefit?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Angelheart v. City of Burbank, 232 Cal.App.3d 460, 285 Cal.Rptr. 463 (Cal. App. 1991):

A tangible asset or a concrete gain does not have to be present to satisfy the requirement that the action confer a significant benefit; rather, the effectuation of a fundamental constitutional or statutory policy may be present. (Beach Colony II v. California Coastal Com. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 106, 112, 212 Cal.Rptr. 485.)

Other Questions


In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
Is the prosecution required to accept a stipulation requiring the prosecution to present their case in a witness statement? (California, United States of America)
How have defendants defended their actions in a civil action brought by a plaintiff who alleges they failed to properly raise the railing to comply with the current code requirements? (California, United States of America)
When a personal representative is substituted as a party to a personal injury action, is the personal representative required to present a claim under section 709 of the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
Can a judgment in an unlawful detainer action be used as a bar to recover damages in the present action? (California, United States of America)
Does the continuation rule apply in cases in which the second action arises out of or is a later stage of the original action? (California, United States of America)
Can a city attorney defend or assist in the defense of a criminal action in which the employing city personnel are not involved in any significant respect? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether an action by an official is an action in a private interest? (California, United States of America)
Does the late filing of a complaint in an intervention action require the respondent to respond to the complaint within the time set out in the summons? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff bring an inverse condemnation action against a governmental entity for damage caused to private property caused by a governmental action? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.