Does a suspect need the assistance of counsel to insure fairness of any in person pretrial identification arranged by the police?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Carl T., In re, 1 Cal.App.3d 344, 81 Cal.Rptr. 655 (Cal. App. 1969):

A suspect needs the assistance of counsel to insure the fairness of any in person pretrial identification arranged by the police and to prepare his counsel for effective cross-examination at the trial of the People's witnesses participating in the identification regardless of when the identification occurs or its exact nature, subject to two exceptions. These are: (1) an immediate identification under exigent circumstances such as existed in Stovall, supra, 388 U.S. 293, 302, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199, 1206; and (2) a field identification occurring so immediately after the crime that the participating victim's or eyewitness' identification is without question based entirely on his recollection of the suspect at the time of the crime. This latter form of pretrial in person identification is trustworthy, reliable, and ordinarily immune to any suggestion by the police. Furthermore, the making of such an identification may be as advantageous to the suspect as it is to the police. (See People v. Irvin, 264 Cal.App.2d 747, 759--760, 70 Cal.Rptr. 892; People v. Colgain, 276 A.C.A. 147, 154--156, 80 Cal.Rptr. 659; People v. Levine, 276 A.C.A. 251, 253, 80 Cal.Rptr. 731.)

Other Questions


What is the test of good faith and fair-dealing in the context of an insurance policy where the insurer is required to hire an attorney to defend the insured against the insured? (California, United States of America)
Can a police officer continue to question a suspect after the suspect has invoked his right to counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
If counsel discovered that the burglary had been reduced to a misdemeanor, and lodged an objection below, would counsel have discovered that counsel had discovered that Counsel had discovered it was a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Can a police officer refuse to conduct a patsearch on an armed suspect if they have "no other reason to suspect the person to be armed"? (California, United States of America)
Is ineffective assistance to counsel ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
If a suspect waives his Miranda right to remain silent or counsel during an interview, can the police force continue to question the suspect? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of the appellant's appeal against a finding that counsel provided ineffective assistance and ineffective assistance to counsel? (California, United States of America)
Is a statement made during a police interrogation of a person in custody in an assault case in which the police have advised the person of their right to remain silent? (California, United States of America)
Is a policy of insurance that does not cover an accident which occurs when a person, other than the insured, is driving with the permission and consent of the insured a violation of the public policy of this state? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.