Does a statement of facts need to be omitted from the facts of the underlying offence?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Dipaolo, B223962, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LA062053 (Cal. App. 2011):
2. Since this appeal does not raise any issue regarding the facts of the underlying offense, we omit a statement of facts. (People v. White (1997) 55 Cal.App.4th 914, 916, fn. 2.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a criminal offence punishable by multiple convictions for multiple offences punishable by the same criminal offence against the same defendant concurrent with one criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the facts in our statement of facts in the context of a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Can expert testimony be used to assist the jury in determining whether a statement or series of statements implied defamatory facts? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant is convicted of a secondary offence while he was out on bail for a primary offence, can he be punished for his secondary offence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a statement is one of opinion or a statement of fact? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to appeal against a conviction for assault, what are the relevant facts in the statement of facts? (California, United States of America)
Is a knowingly false statement of fact a constitutionally protected claim? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant's extrajudicial statements form part of the prosecution's evidence, does the trial court have to instruct sua sponte that a finding of guilt cannot be predicated on the statements alone? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has been convicted of a prior criminal offence and therefore must proceed further to determine the conduct underlying the conviction? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted a statement of facts in a motion for class certification? (California, United States of America)
