Does a Respondent Court have jurisdiction to compel production of documents?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Schaff v. Superior Court, 146 Cal.App.3d 921, 194 Cal.Rptr. 546 (Cal. App. 1983):
Respondent court exceeded its jurisdiction in denying husband's motion to compel production of documents. (See Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal (1941) 17 Cal.2d 280, 291, 109 P.2d 942.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a court have jurisdiction to award costs and attorney fees in a personal injury action where the substantive demand is within the jurisdiction of a municipal court? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to be heard by the Court of Appeal at the Superior Court of California for a change of venue, does the Court have any jurisdiction or authority to hear the motion? (California, United States of America)
When a respondent has not filed a respondents' brief in an appeal, can the court order that the respondent must file his or her own brief? (California, United States of America)
Does a superior court have jurisdiction to award a judgment for less than the jurisdictional amount of the superior court? (California, United States of America)
When a judgment of divorce is not self-executing in respect of any division of property ordered, does the court have jurisdiction to make further orders to compel obedience to the order? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have jurisdiction over a cause in the trial court during the pendency of an appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does the majority opinion in the Supreme Court of Canada say that a trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction pending an appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
When a court of appeal has an appealable judgment or order before it, does the court have jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify it? (California, United States of America)
