Does a prosecutor's statement that the trial court appeared aligned with the prosecution constitute a deceptive or reprehensible method of persuasion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Roberson, B279934 (Cal. App. 2018):
did not infect the trial with unfairness, and did not constitute a deceptive or reprehensible method of persuasion. (See People v. Masters, supra, 62 Cal.4th at p. 1052.) There is no possibility jurors applied an incorrect standard based on the prosecutor's quickly corrected statement.
4. Allegation that the trial court appeared aligned with the prosecution
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What constitutes reversible misconduct for a prosecutor who makes use of 'deceptive or reprehensible methods' to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes prosecutorial misconduct if a prosecutor makes use of deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes reversible misconduct for a prosecutor who makes use of 'deceptive or reprehensible methods' to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor commit reversible misconduct if they use deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
Is Ceja's claim that a federal prosecutor used deceptive or reprehensible methods of persuasion to persuade a jury to convict him of a criminal charge that would otherwise have prevented him from going on trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor commit reversible misconduct if he or she makes use of 'deceptive or reprehensible methods' when attempting to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
Can a federal prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct for using deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a prosecutor has been found to have engaged in deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade either the trial court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
Is it a prosecutorial misconduct for a prosecutor to use misleading, deceptive, reprehensible or reprehensible methods to persuade either the court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes deceptive or reprehensible methods to persuade the court or the jury? (California, United States of America)
