Does a prisoner have a general 'right of access' to the courts in civil cases?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Payne v. Superior Court, 132 Cal.Rptr. 405, 17 Cal.3d 908, 553 P.2d 565 (Cal. 1976):

The majority's main premise, however, that indigent prisoners possess a general 'right of access' in the sense that they are entitled to free legal representation or their personal presence in civil courts, either or both, is incorrect under existing decisions of this state. Prisoners in California enjoy only a limited statutory degree of 'access' to the courts. This conclusion is consistent with Penal Code section 2600 which provides that prisoners are deprived of only those rights '. . . necessary in order to provide for the reasonable security of the institution . . . and for the reasonable protection of the public.' The right to appear personally in court is, of course, one which necessarily involves considerations of both institutional security and of public safety. Until now it had been assumed that a prisoner possessed no such right in civil actions. (Wood v. Superior Court (1974) 36 Cal.App.3d 811, 813, 112 Cal.Rptr. 157, and cases cited.) With respect to the asserted right to appointed counsel for prisoners in civil cases it is not accurate to say that prisoners are 'deprived' of such a right, for under existing law even nonprisoner indigents have no abstract

Page 420

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How has the US Supreme Court treated the case law in the context of civil rights cases? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the courts deny access to the courts in civil cases to defendants who do not speak English? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a demurrer to deny or deny a plaintiff's civil rights claim against a civil servant who allegedly participated in civil rights violations? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the statute of limitations in civil rights cases apply to causes of action for deprivations of civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Does the denial of access to the courts by the Department of Justice to defend a civil case against a defendant who is not able to pay for a lawyer to represent him in court constitute a prima facie equal protection violation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with civil cases dealing with sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.