Does a postjudgment motion for attorney fees compel a different result?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Andersen v. Hunt, B221077 (Cal. App. 2011):
City of Santa Paula v. Narula (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 485, on which petitioners rely, does not compel a different result. There, the city filed a postjudgment motion for attorney fees after successfully pursuing a real property lien enforcement action. The court awarded the city the requested fees and the property owners appealed. On appeal,
Page 28
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a motion denying a motion to disqualify an opposing attorney's attorney appealable? (California, United States of America)
Is a client's attorney required to repay all moneys laid out by the attorney to the attorney before the client can make a claim against the attorney? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a motion to amend a motion in the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion by a defendant who alleges that the motion was improperly adjourned? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for a motion to compel an attorney to produce a document containing attorney-client privilege? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proof for a motion to dismiss a motion where the motion is to be heard at a different venue? (California, United States of America)
Can a district attorney request a motion to recuse the office of the District Attorney's Office from prosecution of a charge of sexual assault based on race, religion or other arbitrary classification? (California, United States of America)
Does the motion for reconsideration need to be treated as a motion for relief based on attorney mistake? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a denial of a motion to vacate and a motion for reconsideration? (California, United States of America)
Can an attorney who is sued for malpractice by a former client cross-complain for equitable indemnity against a successor attorney who has been hired to extricate the client from the condition created by the predecessor attorney? (California, United States of America)
Does section 12022.7 of the California Code of Civil Procedure compel a different result? (California, United States of America)
