Does a plaintiff have to meet a second step of the anti-SLAPP inquiry?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Banghu v. City of Fontana, E063998 (Cal. App. 2016):
sufficient discrimination claim. (Navellier v. Sletten, supra, 29 Cal.4th at pp. 88-89.) Plaintiffs did not meet their burden on this second step of the anti-SLAPP inquiry.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
Does a modification to plaintiff's liability in a medical malpractice case alter plaintiff's claim for personal injury? (California, United States of America)
When a search warrant is issued for a second time for a defendant's cell phone, what is the difference between the first and second searches? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury convict a defendant of second degree murder under the second degree felony-murder rule? (California, United States of America)
Does the second degree felony of discharging a firearm constitute a second-degree felony-murder? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, is a plaintiff entitled to damages from the other plaintiff? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant seek to overturn a conviction for second-degree murder by appealing against the finding that the trial court failed to instruct on the charge of second degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury convict a defendant of second degree murder under the second degree felony-murder rule? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury still convict a defendant of second degree second-degree murder if he shot his wife while committing an assault with a deadly weapon? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for establishing that a plaintiff is entitled to the same procedural safeguards as a plaintiff? (California, United States of America)
