California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Petrou v. South Coast Emergency Group, 119 Cal.App.4th 1090, 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 64 (Cal. App. 2004):
In support of their interpretation, defendants rely on Miranda v. National Emergency Services, Inc., supra, 35 Cal. App.4th 894, 41 Cal.Rptr.2d 593, arguing it held the five-year period was measured from the time of trial. Not so. Miranda did state that an expert witness was qualified under section 1799.110(c) "if he or she is a physician who has had `substantial professional experience,' within the five years preceding the trial, while employed or otherwise engaged by a general acute care hospital to provide treatment in its emergency room as an `emergency room physician.' [Citation.]" (Id. at p. 905, 41 Cal.Rptr.2d 593.) But this must be viewed in the context of the issue considered, whether a physician who worked sporadically as a consultant in an emergency room provided "emergency medical coverage" so as to be qualified as an expert. Although
[119 Cal.App.4th 1097]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.