The following excerpt is from Jacob v. C.I.R., 37 F.3d 1505 (9th Cir. 1994):
1 The notice of deficiency was valid despite having been addressed to "495 Margrave Drive" instead of "495 Margrave Street". See, e.g., Clodfelter v. Commissioner, 57 T.C. 102, 107 (1971) (inconsequential errors in addressing a notice of deficiency do not destroy its validity), aff'd, 527 F.2d 754 (9th Cir.1975).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.