California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Buycks, 236 Cal.Rptr.3d 84, 422 P.3d 531, 5 Cal.5th 857 (Cal. 2018):
Concerning whether a new law applies both prospectively and retroactively, the rules are well established. No part of the Penal Code "is retroactive, unless expressly so declared." ( 3.) "[T]he language of section 3 erects a strong presumption of prospective operation, codifying the principle that, in the absence of an express retroactivity provision, a statute will not be applied retroactively unless it is very clear from extrinsic sources that the [lawmakers] ... must have intended a retroactive application. [Citations.] Accordingly, "a statute that is ambiguous with respect to retroactive application is construed ... to be unambiguously prospective." " ( People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 324, 142 Cal.Rptr.3d 824, 278 P.3d 1182.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.