The following excerpt is from Frankl ex rel. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adams & Assocs., Inc., No. 2:14-cv-02766-KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. 2014):
The court need not address this motion because, in deciding petitioner's motion for temporary relief, the court does not rely on the new facts introduced, for the first time, with petitioner's reply. See Zamani v. Carnes, 491 F.3d 990, 997 (9th Cir. 2007) ("[D]istrict court need not consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief.").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.