The following excerpt is from Barrett v. GEO, Grp., 21cv1603-CAB (JLB) (S.D. Cal. 2021):
791 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2015) (A district court should not dismiss a pro se complaint without leave to amend [pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)] unless it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment.'), quoting Akhtar v. Mesa, 698 F.3d 1202, 1212 (9th Cir. 2012).
III. Motion for Appointment of Counsel
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.