Does a mistake in failing to instruct the jury that a defendant's memory in recounting events may have been impaired by intoxication affect his substantial rights?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Kumar, C074620 (Cal. App. 2019):

Based on our review of the evidence, we conclude any error in failing to instruct the jury that defendant's memory in recounting the events may have been impaired by intoxication was harmless. Since the error was harmless, it could not have affected his substantial rights. (People v. Franco, supra, 180 Cal.App.4th at p. 720.)

3. CALCRIM No. 226

Other Questions


Is an order made after judgment affecting a defendant's substantial rights affecting his substantial rights appealable? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for appealability of an order made after a judgment affecting substantial rights affecting defendant's substantial rights? (California, United States of America)
Is a probation order revoked after judgment affecting substantial rights affecting a defendant's substantial rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure to instruct a defendant on intoxication constitute an error in failing to instruct on intoxication? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant who fails to assert his substantial rights in a timely manner when an appeal is available from the judgment no longer have substantial rights for appellate purposes? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a substantial rights claim against the Attorney General for failing to lodge an objection to a flight instruction? (California, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have a substantial right to sue the Defendant for breach of his substantial rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a substantial rights claim against the Attorney General for failing to lodge an objection to a flight instruction? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant's claim that defense counsel negligent in failing to request an other-crimes limiting instruction under CALJIC No.50 fails, what are the consequences? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the prosecution reduced the burden of proving a defendant's guilt by failing to instruct the jury that refusal was insufficient to establish guilt? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.