Does a jury need to "assume" or "presume" that the sentence in the penalty phase will be carried out?

Is a defendant's failure to testify at the penalty phase an error not to instruct the jury to refrain from drawing any inference from the fact that defendant did not testify at penalty phase? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances will a jury not be instructed to "assume or "presume" that the sentence will be carried out? (California, United States of America)

In a penalty retrial of a convicted murderer, what is the effect of a hung jury at the penalty phase of his penalty trial? (California, United States of America)

Does section 190.3 of the California Criminal Code require a penalty phase jury to consider a defendant's unadjudicated criminal activity as a mitigating factor in the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)

In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)

Does section 654 of the California Death Penalty Act prohibit a penalty phase jury from considering separate crimes based on the same act of violence? (California, United States of America)

How the death penalty is carried out and what conditions in prison might be for a person serving a sentence of life without possibility of parole? (California, United States of America)

Can a prosecutor's penalty phase argument for a life without Possibility of Parole (LOPP) sentence be heard before a jury? (California, United States of America)

In a penalty case, in what circumstances was the trial court's opinion that defense counsel had done a great job preparing the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)

Can a prosecutor commit misconduct under the federal penalty standard at the penalty phase of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)