Does a judge have to provide an abstract of judgment reflecting 23 actual days of custody credit?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Childers, C078134 (Cal. App. 2016):

credit. Accordingly, the trial court must prepare a corrected abstract of judgment reflecting 23 actual days of custody credit. (People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185.)

Other Questions


Does a judge have to correct abstracts of judgment that do not accurately reflect the oral judgment of the sentencing court? (California, United States of America)
Can an abstract of judgment be amended to reflect the actual sentence imposed by the trial judge? (California, United States of America)
If an abstract of judgment fails to reflect the judgment pronounced by the trial court, can the abstract be corrected? (California, United States of America)
Can an abstract of judgment be amended to reflect the actual sentence imposed in the trial judge's verbal pronouncement? (California, United States of America)
Can a court correct an abstract of judgment that does not reflect the actual sentence imposed in the trial judge's verbal pronouncement? (California, United States of America)
Is an abstract of judgment based on the actual sentence imposed by the trial judge? (California, United States of America)
Is an abstract of judgment based on the actual sentence imposed by the trial judge? (California, United States of America)
Is an abstract of judgment based on the actual sentence imposed by the trial judge? (California, United States of America)
Can an abstract of judgment be corrected to conform to the actual sentence imposed by the trial judge? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General have the authority to modify the abstract of judgment to clearly reflect the oral pronouncement of judgment? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.