Does a judge have qualified immunity to deny a plaintiff's access to a kosher meal?

^8. In sum, the court concluded that pursuant to Shakur v. Schriro, 514 F.3d 878, prison officials should have known that "kosher meals for a non-Jew who claims a religious need for such meals could only be denied on the basis of countervailing and legitimate penological interests," and that the question of whether qualified immunity applied could not be determined without further factual development. ECF No. 37 at 10-11.