Does a judge have an inherent power to correct a judgment to reflect what the law requires?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from The People v. Lopez, No. E048629, No. FWV900285 (Cal. App. 2010):

"[T]his court has the inherent power to correct the judgment to reflect what the law requires. [Citations.]" (People v. Guiffre, supra, 167 Cal.App.4th at p. 435.)

Other Questions


Does a judge have to correct abstracts of judgment that do not accurately reflect the oral judgment of the sentencing court? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a judge presume the judgment correct in a motion requiring a reporter's transcript? (California, United States of America)
If an abstract of judgment fails to reflect the judgment pronounced by the trial court, can the abstract be corrected? (California, United States of America)
Can a court correct an abstract of judgment that does not reflect the actual sentence imposed in the trial judge's verbal pronouncement? (California, United States of America)
Does the abstract of judgment need to be corrected to reflect the intended sentence? (California, United States of America)
Does an abstract of judgment need to be corrected or corrected on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have authority to order the correction of abstracts of judgment in a case where the abstracts do not accurately reflect the sentencing of a defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does a judge have the power to overturn a judgment of death in a death penalty case? (California, United States of America)
Does a judge have the power to set aside a judgment against defendants on equitable grounds? (California, United States of America)
When a judge makes a judgment in a minute order, does the judge have to deliver the abstract in an oral order? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.