The following excerpt is from Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc., In re, 46 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 1994):
Spitters next argues that the general rule releasing a surety if the promisee does not proceed first against the principal entitles Spitters to relief from the one-action rule. This case does not appear to involve a surety. Even if it did, the proposition urged by Spitters was rejected by Commercial Bank v. Kershner, 52 P. 848 (Cal. 1898). That case holds that a surety in California is "charged with knowledge" of the one-action rule. Id. at 850.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.