Does a finding of bad faith need to be considered?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Summers v. City of Cathedral City, 225 Cal.App.3d 1047, 275 Cal.Rptr. 594 (Cal. App. 1990):

21 In Pyne v. Meese (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 392, 405, 218 Cal.Rptr. 87, a case relied upon by the City, the trial court expressly found that the behavior of the party whom he sanctioned was "frivolous and in bad faith." Given that finding, it is of little authority for the proposition that a finding of bad faith is unnecessary.

Other Questions


Is it sufficient for the jury to consider the error in finding that the jury considered evidence from which it could have come to a verdict without reliance on reliance on the error? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding of intent to inflict pain and suffering need to be considered as an element of a special-circumstance finding? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a finding as to whether evidence was destroyed in good faith or bad faith? (California, United States of America)
What evidence does the jury need to consider if defendant was deliberating on a finding of murder? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure of instruction to require a jury to produce written findings by the jury regarding the aggravating factors found and considered in returning a death sentence violate a defendant's constitutional right to meaningful appellate review? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a jury to consider whether to consider the lesser included charge of attempted voluntary manslaughter as a lesser included offense of attempted premeditated murder? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have to consider felony murder or premeditated murder before it considers the lesser included offense of second degree murder? (California, United States of America)
Is the law requiring a jury to produce written findings when the jury is not able to produce the written findings? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury's collective finding of doubt constitute a collective finding that a juror has a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a de novo review of the findings of the Court of Appeal of a finding that a plaintiff was sexually assaulted during her pregnancy? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.