California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Chyczewski v. Chyczewski (In re Chyczewski), G050620 (Cal. App. 2015):
Woods v. Superior Court (1983) 149 Cal.App.3d 931 (Woods) speaks directly to a family business attorney's inherent conflict in undertaking to represent one spouse in a dissolution proceeding. The key point from Woods is that the business attorney necessarily "in a very real sense continues to represent" the other spouse. (Woods, supra, 149 Cal.App.3d at p. 935.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.