California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Peyman v. Peyman (In re Marriage of Peyman), B300628 (Cal. App. 2021):
However, a different standard applies where, as here, the appellant had the burden of proof in the family court. "'In the case where the trier of fact has expressly or implicitly concluded that the party with the burden of proof did not carry the burden and that party appeals, it is misleading to characterize the failure-of-proof issue as whether substantial evidence supports the judgment.' [Citation.] '[W]here the issue on appeal turns on a failure of proof at trial, the question for a reviewing court becomes whether the evidence compels a finding in favor of the appellant as a matter of law.'" (Juen v. Alain Pinel Realtors, Inc.
Page 21
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.